<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Deep Leagues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepleagues.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepleagues.com</link>
	<description>Your home for extreme fantasy baseball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 03:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Would You Rather: Trade Edition Two by Evan</title>
		<link>http://www.deepleagues.com/2013/03/11/rather-trade-edition-2/comment-page-1/#comment-21582</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 03:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepleagues.com/?p=4176#comment-21582</guid>
		<description>I would go B on all 3 trades I feel like there is more upside with those players.

On an unrelated note, what do you guys think of Matt Moore&#039;s spring and control issues?

Spring 2013: 6.8 BB/9
2012: 4.1 BB/9
Majors 2011: 2.9 BB/9
Minors 2011: 2.7
2010: 3.8
2009: 5.1

did the 2011 season inflate my expectations? I was very high on him but I am starting to get concerned. TB has tons of rotation depth so if he struggles I could see them demoting him

Thanks for any input and thanks for the great content. I love this site!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would go B on all 3 trades I feel like there is more upside with those players.</p>
<p>On an unrelated note, what do you guys think of Matt Moore&#8217;s spring and control issues?</p>
<p>Spring 2013: 6.8 BB/9<br />
2012: 4.1 BB/9<br />
Majors 2011: 2.9 BB/9<br />
Minors 2011: 2.7<br />
2010: 3.8<br />
2009: 5.1</p>
<p>did the 2011 season inflate my expectations? I was very high on him but I am starting to get concerned. TB has tons of rotation depth so if he struggles I could see them demoting him</p>
<p>Thanks for any input and thanks for the great content. I love this site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2013 Top 100 Prospects by Geo007</title>
		<link>http://www.deepleagues.com/2013/03/03/2013-top-100-prospect-list/comment-page-2/#comment-21571</link>
		<dc:creator>Geo007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 20:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepleagues.com/?p=3990#comment-21571</guid>
		<description>Of the Lancing 3, which I was fortunate enough to watch live, Aaron Sanchez was the LEAST polished. But he did have the best stuff and the highest ceiling. Nicolino was polished but didn&#039;t have electric stuff, while Syndergaard was good, very controlled. Sanchez has high walks, but that was because he was still physically maturing to the tune of 1 mph added to his fastball every month. He went from a 92mph to 97mp by seasons end. AA, the blue Jays GM, projected Sanchez to have the highest ceiling of the Lancing 3 and was the reason why he was kept and not traded.

BTW...nice to be back home! Good posts Kyle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of the Lancing 3, which I was fortunate enough to watch live, Aaron Sanchez was the LEAST polished. But he did have the best stuff and the highest ceiling. Nicolino was polished but didn&#8217;t have electric stuff, while Syndergaard was good, very controlled. Sanchez has high walks, but that was because he was still physically maturing to the tune of 1 mph added to his fastball every month. He went from a 92mph to 97mp by seasons end. AA, the blue Jays GM, projected Sanchez to have the highest ceiling of the Lancing 3 and was the reason why he was kept and not traded.</p>
<p>BTW&#8230;nice to be back home! Good posts Kyle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2013 Top 100 Prospects by N.1.A.K.</title>
		<link>http://www.deepleagues.com/2013/03/03/2013-top-100-prospect-list/comment-page-2/#comment-21569</link>
		<dc:creator>N.1.A.K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 03:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepleagues.com/?p=3990#comment-21569</guid>
		<description>Cowart not making this list is a travesty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cowart not making this list is a travesty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reader Profiles: Morris, Brinson, Graham, and Brown by Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.deepleagues.com/2013/03/15/reader-profiles-morris-brinson-graham-brown/comment-page-1/#comment-21555</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 02:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepleagues.com/?p=4189#comment-21555</guid>
		<description>Actually, I think that&#039;s the best synopsis of Brown that I&#039;ve read! 
Keep up the good</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I think that&#8217;s the best synopsis of Brown that I&#8217;ve read!<br />
Keep up the good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reader Profiles: Morris, Brinson, Graham, and Brown by Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.deepleagues.com/2013/03/15/reader-profiles-morris-brinson-graham-brown/comment-page-1/#comment-21554</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepleagues.com/?p=4189#comment-21554</guid>
		<description>Profile of Brown is a little on the short side. 

I think you&#039;re pretty optimistic on Morris. I&#039;d be delighted with .280 and 20+HR if I owned him. But then, maybe that&#039;s why I don&#039;t own him anywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Profile of Brown is a little on the short side. </p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re pretty optimistic on Morris. I&#8217;d be delighted with .280 and 20+HR if I owned him. But then, maybe that&#8217;s why I don&#8217;t own him anywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 20 by Position: Primer by Dusty</title>
		<link>http://www.deepleagues.com/2013/02/19/top-15-position-primer/comment-page-1/#comment-21549</link>
		<dc:creator>Dusty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 08:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepleagues.com/?p=4148#comment-21549</guid>
		<description>Hi there, just wanted to mention, I liked this article. It was practical. Keep on posting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there, just wanted to mention, I liked this article. It was practical. Keep on posting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Would You Rather: Trade Edition Two by Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.deepleagues.com/2013/03/11/rather-trade-edition-2/comment-page-1/#comment-21548</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 22:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepleagues.com/?p=4176#comment-21548</guid>
		<description>As Simon (and I) said above, if you were a dynasty GM you&#039;d have to consider the first trade as Sanchez for Hedges/Arcia, with Starling nothing more than a throw-in until he proves otherwise. Sanchez&#039; offensive potential at C would place him within the top 5-7 fantasy catchers, whereas Hedges is probably ranked late teen&#039;s-early 20&#039;s. Arcia may have the tools to be a top 75 OF, but definitely not a top 50. 

So, a top 5-7 catcher for a downgrade to 20-ish and a top 75 OF. I think that if you look at the current rankings or ADP you would feel quite differently. This trade is akin to trading Matt WIeters for a Russell Martin/Jordan Pacheco level C and Colby Rasmus/Cody Ross level OF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Simon (and I) said above, if you were a dynasty GM you&#8217;d have to consider the first trade as Sanchez for Hedges/Arcia, with Starling nothing more than a throw-in until he proves otherwise. Sanchez&#8217; offensive potential at C would place him within the top 5-7 fantasy catchers, whereas Hedges is probably ranked late teen&#8217;s-early 20&#8242;s. Arcia may have the tools to be a top 75 OF, but definitely not a top 50. </p>
<p>So, a top 5-7 catcher for a downgrade to 20-ish and a top 75 OF. I think that if you look at the current rankings or ADP you would feel quite differently. This trade is akin to trading Matt WIeters for a Russell Martin/Jordan Pacheco level C and Colby Rasmus/Cody Ross level OF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 20: First Basemen by Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.deepleagues.com/2013/03/07/top-20-basemen/comment-page-1/#comment-21547</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepleagues.com/?p=4184#comment-21547</guid>
		<description>Any thoughts on Miles Head?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any thoughts on Miles Head?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 20: First Basemen by Justinn</title>
		<link>http://www.deepleagues.com/2013/03/07/top-20-basemen/comment-page-1/#comment-21546</link>
		<dc:creator>Justinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepleagues.com/?p=4184#comment-21546</guid>
		<description>Any thoughts on Miles Head?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any thoughts on Miles Head?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Would You Rather: Trade Edition Two by kpulek</title>
		<link>http://www.deepleagues.com/2013/03/11/rather-trade-edition-2/comment-page-1/#comment-21545</link>
		<dc:creator>kpulek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepleagues.com/?p=4176#comment-21545</guid>
		<description>@Simon

I respect your opinion. This is a little bit of a rebuttal of how I&#039;d go about it.

1. I don&#039;t think Starling makes it. I think he flames out. People are holding out hope and I respect that. But when you look at the numbers, there are a good number of top draft picks that fail. It happens. And I realize it sucks to know that I&#039;ve had him in my top 20 or just around, he&#039;s more than likely to be one of those draft casualties. I don&#039;t think you can strike out 30% in rookie ball and then bounce back and hit for power, for contact, and do everything just as well as your K&#039;s go magically down. That leaves Hedges and Arcia versus Sanchez. And I&#039;m definitely a bigger fan of Arcia than most. So that&#039;s why I tip towards Hedges/Arcia.

Bradley/Goodwin is an interesting debate. Mostly, I see Bradley hitting in the 2 hole, with a high AVG/OBP and decent pop and speed. He&#039;s a lock to be in CF, which is always a plus. He may not be 20/20 like Goodwin, but I don&#039;t doubt his ability to be 15/15. And with the higher average, I&#039;ll take Bradley. There is more upside with Goodwin/Hanson, but I&#039;m going to stick with Story/Bradley, because I like the blend of talents and I&#039;d feel more comfortable with them. It&#039;s one of those pairs that if I owned either side, I probably wouldn&#039;t trade them for the other. 

With Rosey headed to the &#039;pen, I could see myself flipping here. I think what Eric noted does have merit, that they might get comfortable with him there. I think that depends on the Wainwright and Garcia situations. I think I&#039;d probably flip to Martinez/Rosario, and hope that both of them pan out. But this is also close.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Simon</p>
<p>I respect your opinion. This is a little bit of a rebuttal of how I&#8217;d go about it.</p>
<p>1. I don&#8217;t think Starling makes it. I think he flames out. People are holding out hope and I respect that. But when you look at the numbers, there are a good number of top draft picks that fail. It happens. And I realize it sucks to know that I&#8217;ve had him in my top 20 or just around, he&#8217;s more than likely to be one of those draft casualties. I don&#8217;t think you can strike out 30% in rookie ball and then bounce back and hit for power, for contact, and do everything just as well as your K&#8217;s go magically down. That leaves Hedges and Arcia versus Sanchez. And I&#8217;m definitely a bigger fan of Arcia than most. So that&#8217;s why I tip towards Hedges/Arcia.</p>
<p>Bradley/Goodwin is an interesting debate. Mostly, I see Bradley hitting in the 2 hole, with a high AVG/OBP and decent pop and speed. He&#8217;s a lock to be in CF, which is always a plus. He may not be 20/20 like Goodwin, but I don&#8217;t doubt his ability to be 15/15. And with the higher average, I&#8217;ll take Bradley. There is more upside with Goodwin/Hanson, but I&#8217;m going to stick with Story/Bradley, because I like the blend of talents and I&#8217;d feel more comfortable with them. It&#8217;s one of those pairs that if I owned either side, I probably wouldn&#8217;t trade them for the other. </p>
<p>With Rosey headed to the &#8216;pen, I could see myself flipping here. I think what Eric noted does have merit, that they might get comfortable with him there. I think that depends on the Wainwright and Garcia situations. I think I&#8217;d probably flip to Martinez/Rosario, and hope that both of them pan out. But this is also close.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
